Agent Lab — a live forecast exhibit · Applied AI
← Schedule
Group H · Matchday 11 · 2026-06-21

Uruguay vs Cape Verde

Miami Gardens, United States · neutral venue

Full time URU 2–2 CPV
The agent called Uruguay (69%) — Worse than the model call wrong

The forecast below is what the agent published before kickoff.

Most likely scoreline
1–0 19.0%
59.3%
URU win
27.0%
Draw
13.7%
CPV win
Top scorelines
  • 1–0 19.0%
  • 0–0 16.3%
  • 2–0 13.3%
  • 1–1 8.8%
Total goals
0 to 10 goals · most likely → tallest

The agent’s call

3-agent ensemble · deepseek-chat
URU win
69.3%
Draw
20.7%
CPV win
10.0%

The model's prior (62% Uruguay win) is reasonable but understates the squad quality gap: Uruguay's squad is 9.4x more valuable and features world-class players at top clubs, while Cape Verde's key men play at lower levels. Cape Verde's recent form and draw with Spain are impressive, but that result was a defensive outlier; Uruguay's poor form came against stronger opposition (avg rank #31 vs #60). The conditions (heat/humidity) are neutral or slightly favour Uruguay's deeper squad. I raise Uruguay's win probability to 70%, lowering draw and away win accordingly. Uruguay's expected goals (1.58) reflect a moderate attack, but Cape Verde's defence (0.47 xGA) suggests they can keep it tight. The most likely scorelines are 1-0 and 2-0, with a non-negligible chance of 0-0 if Cape Verde repeat their Spain performance. I keep the model's scoreline shape but shift probability slightly toward Uruguay clean-sheet wins.

What the agent weighed
What the agent chose to investigate
The agent decided what to check on tavily — 9 sources kept:
  • “Uruguay squad injuries suspensions June 2026” URU · 3 hits
    Late fitness or suspension news could significantly impact Uruguay's strength.
  • “Cape Verde squad injuries suspensions June 2026” CPV · 3 hits
    Key player absences could shift Cape Verde's chances.
  • “Miami Gardens weather forecast June 21 2026” match · 3 hits
    Extreme heat or rain could affect playing conditions and tactics.
Agent scorelines
generated 2026-06-21
Last 5 — URU
-0.80 pts/match vs model expectation · opp. avg #34
  • MEX #20 -0.4
  • USA #37 -1.6
  • ENG #4 +0.2
  • ALG #33 -0.8
  • KSA #74 -1.1
GF / GA last 10: 11 / 8
Last 5 — CPV
+0.60 pts/match vs model expectation · opp. avg #59
  • CHI #28 -0.9
  • FIN #68 -0.3
  • SER #30 +2.1
  • BER #169 +0.1
  • ESP #1 +0.7
GF / GA last 10: 17 / 9
Head-to-head (last 5)

No prior meetings in the dataset.

▸ Full score grid (7×7)
P(home goals × away goals), %
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0
16.3
7.5
2.1
0.4
0.1
0.0
0.0
1
19.0
8.8
2.4
0.5
0.1
0.0
0.0
2
13.3
6.1
1.7
0.4
0.1
0.0
0.0
3
7.3
3.4
0.9
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
4
3.4
1.6
0.4
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
5
1.4
0.7
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
6
0.6
0.3
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0

Rows = URU goals; columns = CPV goals. Above-diagonal cells are home wins; diagonal = draws; below = away wins. Truncated at 6 — the joint mass past that is < 1 %.

Expected goals (Poisson rate, λ)
1.53
URU
0.51
CPV

Independent-Poisson rates. W/D/L and the score grid integrate the full 13×13 joint under these two parameters.

News context — injuries, suspensions, projected XI — is not part of the model, which sees only past results.